Stakeholder's Feedback

Student feedback:

• A Graduate Student Exit Survey is done for the outgoing students in which questionnaires are answered by the students.
• A CRC (Class Review Committee) meeting consisting of students from every year is conducted twice in semester to know the status of the courses being taught and identify the difficulties of students if any. Appropriate measures are immediately taken by the heads of the department to resolve them.
• Feedback on Faculty: Feedback is taken from the students Twice in Semester about faculty performance through the Institutes BEES ERP software. Each student is provided with a well-designed feedback form specifying the subject and corresponding faculty name with 10 criteria for evaluation, with a total of 100 marks for each faculty. The feedback of each faculty is calculated. Faculty with feedback above 90 are considered as Excellent, above 85 as Very good, above 80 as Good and below 80 as Average. After feedback analysis faculty are intimated the same and advised accordingly for necessary improvement of performance where necessary. Corrective action with change of faculty is also implemented if considered essential by the Academic Committee.

Sample Student Feedback Forms on Curriculum

Student Satisfication Report (Sample Form) - Process

Click here to give Student Feedback

Alumni feedback:

Feedback from Alumni is collected every year to know the accomplishment/progress in their professional advancement after graduation, based on the Graduate Programme Study at the institution. This feedback helps in assessing the status of the institution with respect to the industry demands and also helps to refines PEO’s. It gives an insight into the various modern technologies that a graduate needs to be aware of so as to fare well in the industry. The department/institute analyzes these feedbacks and updates the programs accordingly.

Sample Alumni Feedback Forms on Curriculum

Click here to give Alumni Feedback

Employers feedback:

The feedback from the employers on the alumni performance and the necessity of revising the curriculum to suit the present industrial needs is obtained through the Training and Placement Cell.

The feedback collected from the stakeholders are used in the following places

• To check whether the Vision and Mission of the departments as well as the institution are being met.
• To take inputs while Forming and updating program curriculums.
• Improving quality of the various programs offered by the institute.
• To check Attainment levels of the PEOs (Program Educational objectives) .
• To know if the infrastructural facilities and other facilities provided by the institution like library, Wifi , transport, hostel etc are good.
• To analyze the impact of the teaching learning methodologies used in the institution.
• To analyze the performance of faculty.

Returns

Faculty feedback:

With autonomy to reframe syllabus to meet the changing needs of the industry syllabus is reframed regularly at least once in 2 years. In the syllabus reframing process; feedback from stakeholders is considered an important aspect. As a part of this feedback from faculty is considered vital too.

Feedback and suggestions by faculty about addition/deletion of contents in the existing syllabus is collected by way of choosing Course Co-coordinators for each course, who are expected to discuss with all the faculty members handling the same course and identifying betterment options parallel aligned with Industry needs, AICTE & UGC guidelines and connecting with future courses. The suggestions and recommendations of modifications are represented by the Course Coordinator to Department Academic Committee. The Department Academic Committee, Department Advisory Committee along with Course Coordinator frame the new syllabus which is then proposed for approval to the Board of Studies(BoS) which includes Industry experts, University Academic experts concerned eminent subject experts and Alumni. The syllabus on approval by BoS with necessary changes if any, is put forward to Academic Council for Approval/Ratification.

The feedback of the faculty is considered important in this regard, as they would help in suggesting the importance and relevance of the contents in the expected scenario.

Click here to give Faculty Feedback